CNN调查:由班农支持的闫博士关于新冠病毒起源的“Shoddy”研究

lindamy

时代广场舞照跳
VIP
注册
2005-11-23
消息
24,188
荣誉分数
5,907
声望点数
373

“Shoddy” Coronavirus Study linked to Steve Bannon

Weird的科学:班农支持的“Shoddy”的关于新冠病毒起源的文章是如何传播给数百万人的?

Weird science: How a 'shoddy' Bannon-backed paper on coronavirus origins made its way to an audience of millions

(CNN)It was a blockbuster story. A respected Chinese virologist appeared on Tucker Carlson's showon Fox News in mid-September to share the results of her just-completed report. The conclusion: The novel coronavirus that causes Covid-19 was likely engineered in a Chinese lab. On Carlson's show, she claimed it was intentionally released into the world.

Then, its validity began to unravel. The publication of the paper by lead author Li-Meng Yan -- an expatriate from China seeking asylum in the US -- was quickly linked to former White House adviser Steve Bannon, long a strident critic of China's government. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security -- a leading authority on the pandemic -- criticized the science behind the report, and pointed out that Yan and her co-authors "cite multiple papers in their reference section that have weaknesses or flaws."

A CNN review of Yan's research found it was also built on what appears to be the same theories, similar passages and identidcal charts presented by an anonymous blogger whose writings were posted on a website linked to Bannon months earlier. Additionally, a source told CNN the three co-authors of Yan's paper used pseudonyms instead of their real names, a practice frowned upon in scientific and academic work.

Yet, even after Facebook slapped a "false information" flag on Carlson's September 15 interview with Yan and Twitter suspended Yan's account, Carlson, Bannon and Yan have pressed forward.

"You'd think that our media would want to get to the bottom of this pandemic," Carlson said on his October 6 show, "but instead they ignored her claims."

Yan -- who is back on Twitter -- published a second report on October 8 titled "SARS-CoV-2 is an Unrestricted Bioweapon," which doubled down on the theory that the virus sweeping the globe was manmade and added that its "unleashing" was intentional. That study also included material seemingly copied from the anonymous blogger.

Both of Yan's controversial papers link to Bannon.

Prominently featured on both -- just beneath the title and authors, in a manner that resembles how university affiliations and funding sources are often listed -- are the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation.

The twin non-profit ventures were announced in November 2018 by Bannon and billionaire Guo Wengui, aka Miles Guo, a Chinese exile and fierce critic of the current regime in China. Bannon was arrested on Guo's yacht this summer for the unrelated allegation that he defrauded donors who contributed to his crowdfunding campaign to support President Donald Trump's border wall.

Steve Bannon's arrest is the perfect symbol of the Trump era
Steve Bannon's arrest is the perfect symbol of the Trump era


The two men have repeatedly advanced the theory that the coronavirus came out of a Chinese bioweapons program -- a claim that has been widely panned as groundless -- using as their primary platforms a podcast hosted by Bannon and a website called G News, which publishes their content. Their names are prominently displayed in the top banner of the site's home page.

This month, while praising Yan's work on Bannon's podcast, Bannon and Guo went as far as to suggest that China deliberately infected President Trump with the coronavirus.

That podcast -- called "War Room: Pandemic" -- was recorded the day after Trump was hospitalized for Covid-19.

Bannon credited Guo for saying from the beginning that the virus not only purposefully emerged from the labs, but that "a target is Donald J. Trump."
Bannon asked Guo: "Do you believe that a super-spreader or somebody, was actually sent and somehow has been focused on the White House or focused on President --"

"100 percent," Guo said.

Bannon himself appeared on Carlson's show on September 17 -- two days after Carlson's interview with Yan -- where he touted Yan's "amazing paper" and blasted social-media outlets for slowing its spread without revealing his own connection to the study.

Carlson included a disclaimer in a later interview with Yan on October 6, saying, "we are not endorsing your findings." But a Fox News spokesperson declined to address CNN's question of why Carlson hasn't disclosed Bannon's involvement with Yan's paper when discussing her research on several shows.

Bannon did not respond to CNN's request for comment; Yan declined a request to be interviewed and did not answer repeated requests for responses to specific questions.

Flawed citations, copied passages, mysterious co-authors

It was precisely the megaphone provided by Carlson and Bannon online and on TV that prompted the researchers at Johns Hopkins to issue a rebuttal, according to two of the Johns Hopkins authors, who spoke with CNN.

"It was clear on social media that the paper was getting more and more attention," said Nancy D. Connell, a microbial geneticist and a senior scholar at Johns Hopkins. "We talked carefully and thought for a long time whether to do it."

YAN AND RULE OF LAW SOCIETY (p. 1)
Selected portion of a source document hosted by DocumentCloud
View the entire document with DocumentCloud


"On the one hand we don't want to give credence to just so much garbage," added Gigi Kwik Gronvall, an immunologist who is also a senior scholar at the institution. "On the other hand, because it's getting taken seriously, it's important to point out that this is not science ... It's infuriating, because everybody has better things to do."

The Johns Hopkins response to Yan's paper takes issue with the science, launching into a point-by-point rebuttal. It also includes a section pointing out "weaknesses or flaws" in the paper's citations.

One footnote, for instance, leads to an essay by an entrepreneur that only appears on his LinkedIn page after it was rejected by a scientific journal.

Billy Zhang, a sole-proprietor consultant in Massachusetts who works with investors and governments in China, told CNN he was surprised to learn that his critique was cited in Yan's report. LinkedIn initially removed his post, but later decided to reinstate it.

Another footnote is attributed to an article authored by a writer and editor for an anti-genetically modified food website. Another still traces to an author CNN could not locate, who says he runs a company that appears not to exist. The paper of that author, Dean Bengston, links to a page listing him as the CEO of a Las Vegas company called Meandering Path. But a search of the business name on the Nevada Secretary of State website -- as well as registries for surrounding states and other business databases -- turned up no matching results.

Equally troubling for a scholarly paper was CNN's discovery that Yan's papers bear a strong resemblance to blogs first publishedon G News. Yan's papers contain paragraph after paragraph of identical theories and similar phrasing to the blogs, with some lines lifted nearly word for word.

What's more, Yan's three co-authors in both papers -- Shu Kang, Jie Guan and Shanchang Hu -- are pseudonyms, a source told CNN. It's a practice that is highly unusual in such research and generally discouraged due to the resulting lack of accountability and transparency, experts told CNN. The source didn't know why the use of pseudonyms wasn't disclosed in the papers.

"They are all Chinese but based here in the US," the source said. "They did not want their real names out there for fear of their families back in China."

Dr. Daniel Lucey, an infectious-disease epidemics expert at Georgetown University, said he can't think of another case of authors using pseudonyms in a scientific paper.

"If you used a fake name, then it would start calling into question, under normal circumstances -- if they weren't honest about their name, then what else are they not honest about?" he said.

But Lucey said the authors' concerns in this case might have merit.

"I would also think that the four coauthors would be worried about themselves in terms of ever going back to the mainland or Hong Kong," he said. "It's a real thing."

As part of its review, CNN spoke with a half-dozen experts from multiple institutions, and all of them found Yan's methodology to be flawed. They described her report as "junk science," "leaps of logic" and "window dressing."

Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, said she believes Yan's report set out to deceive for the purpose of spreading "political propaganda."

"This paper is very deceptive to somebody without a scientific background, because it's written in very technical language, using a lot of jargon that makes it sound as though it is a legitimate scientific paper," she told CNN. "But anybody with an actual background in virology or molecular biology who reads this paper will realize that much of it is actually nonsense."
Last I checked, just accusing an entire global community of scientists who rely on evidence to assess data is not itself evidence of said worldwide conspiracy to deliberately cause a pandemic and cover it up. It does, however, fit neatly into a "Blame China" agenda.
— Dr. Angela Rasmussen (@angie_rasmussen) October 8, 2020
Anna Mapp, an associate dean and research professor at the University of Michigan, agreed. "I was really disturbed to see such a shoddy piece of work that I would not accept if turned in to me by one of my own students receiving such attention and being treated as a valid scientific paper," she told CNN. (It was Mapp's graduate student, Amanda Peiffer -- who's working toward a PhD in chemical biology -- who first alerted CNN to issues with the citations at the end of Yan's paper.)

Lucey of Georgetown told CNN that he met with Yan in person to discuss her paper on September 6 -- eight days before it was published.

His criticism was more muted than that of the other scientists who spoke with CNN; Lucey said he found some of what Yan had to say noteworthy.

Ultimately, though, he said he disagrees with Yan's conclusion and told her he couldn't vouch for her science because he's not a molecular virologist.

Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon (L) greets fugitive Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui before introducing him at a news conference on November 20, 2018 in New York.


Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon (L) greets fugitive Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui before introducing him at a news conference on November 20, 2018 in New York.

Lucey said at one point, after much back and forth, he asked Yan a big-picture question: Why would China release a government-engineered virus in Wuhan? Lucey said Yan couldn't provide an answer that he considered plausible.

Lucey said he believes the virus originated in nature. But he disagrees with the much-publicized theory that it jumped from an animal to a human at a seafood market in December.

"Based on what I know about how epidemics have started, I think that it was at least several months earlier," he said. "It could have been out there for more than a year (before December). It's possible."

To be sure, there is no scientific consensus on where the novel coronavirus -- SARS-CoV-2 -- originated. Most of the scientific community -- including Anthony Fauci, the United States' top infectious disease expert -- believes it was not manmade. Other credible scientists  floated the possibility the virus may have leaked from a Wuhan lab, although some contend that an article in Nature Medicine has debunked the notion. 

Yan's first paper claims to refute that widely cited Nature Medicine article, published in mid-March, which concluded that SARS-CoV-2 most likely came from nature and not "purposeful manipulation."

Neither of Yan's papers are peer-reviewed, which by itself is not a disqualifier. Researchers often publish early drafts of their work on what are known as scientific preprint servers to quickly share findings that could benefit the public -- a practice that has accelerated in the urgent age of the coronavirus. 

Yan says she's in hiding

Many experts who read Yan's research said they found it hard to reconcile the work with her seemingly impressive pedigree, which includes a stint at the University of Hong Kong's public health laboratory -- a World Health Organization collaborating facility. She has been published in Natureand The Lancet -- two prestigious academic journals -- and says she was among the first researchers in the world to become privy to the dangers of SARS-CoV-2.

"Dr. Yan's history and training is excellent," Rasmussen said. "I'd really like to hear from her why she decided to do this, because effectively, it has ruined her credibility as a virologist and it would be a career ending mistake to make."

Yan says she fled to the United States in April, according to a Fox News story. In that July piece, she went public with an allegation: Yan claimed that the Chinese government and the WHO had kept mum about their knowledge of the person-to-person transmission of the virus for weeks, even after Yan herself had said she raised the issue with her superiors in late December or early January.

"The reason I came to the US is because I deliver the message of the truth of COVID," Yan, saying she feared for her life, told the network from an undisclosed location in the US.

The Chinese government, WHO and the University of Hong Kong have vehemently denied her July accusation of a coverup.

In her October 6 interview with Carlson, Yan said her mother was arrested by Chinese authorities for making allegations against China on her prior appearances on Fox News. The Chinese government didn't respond to a detailed list of questions from CNN about this and other allegations by Yan.

It's unclear where Yan is staying in the US -- and the extent to which she knows Bannon and Guo.

But a photo that circulated on Twitterlast month and was posted on G News appeared to capture the reflection of a smiling Yan in the mirror behind the two men in the foreground: Wang DingGang, board chair of the Rule of Law Society, and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

Bannon's image can also be seen in the photo.

This photo appears to capture the reflection of virologist Li-Meng Yan in the mirror behind the two men in the foreground: Wang DingGang, board chair of the Rule of Law Society, and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Bannon's image can also be seen in the photo.


This photo appears to capture the reflection of virologist Li-Meng Yan in the mirror behind the two men in the foreground: Wang DingGang, board chair of the Rule of Law Society, and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Bannon's image can also be seen in the photo.

Although Bannon and Guo's Rule of Law Society and Rule of Law Foundation are listed under the titles of Yan's reports, neither paper mentions Bannon or Guo, or elaborates on the role the organizations have played in their creation.

Guo responded to CNN's questions about the link with a statement that said Yan's publications were researched and written independently.

"I have repeatedly stated since as early as January of this year that the COVID-19 pandemic was created by the Chinese Communist Party with the worst of intentions. I stand by these statements," Guo said. "I proudly support Dr. Yan in her efforts to stand up against the CCP mafia and tell the world the truth about COVID-19. Dr. Yan is a hero for her whistleblowing against the CCP and should be commended for her work and personal sacrifice."

Bannon has played up the nonprofits' early and persistent promotion of the lab-origin story. 

"I want to thank Miles Guo because it was Miles Guo and the whistleblower movement, Miles Guo and the Rule of Law Society, the Rule of Law Foundation, that back in early January really got us to start to focus on this," Bannon said on his podcast on October 3.

The two also discussed Yan in that episode, with Guo suggesting she could help prove that the virus was made in a lab. But they made no mention of their connection to her report.

How did coronavirus break out? Theories abound as researchers race to solve genetic detective story
How did coronavirus break out? Theories abound as researchers race to solve genetic detective story


Yan herself has appeared several times on Bannon's podcast. In August, she said the communist regime does "evil things" and discussed its history of persecuting its own people.

The Rule of Law Foundation and Rule of Law Society responded to questions from CNN with two identical statements, signed by their respective board chairs, Hao Haidong and Wang DingGang.

Each statement expresses support for Dr. Yan "and any other Chinese asylee who seeks to tell the world the truth about the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) corruption, atrocious human rights record, and its role in the spread of COVID-19.

"Dr. Yan has independently researched COVID-19 and we respect her findings and desire to speak the truth about COVID-19 to the public," the statement says.

"Our support of Dr. Yan has never included influencing, altering, or editing her scientific research and findings."

The statement said her reference to the organizations in the report "was solely done as an appreciation of our support in helping her flee Hong Kong and avoid arrest for her COVID-19 whistleblowing."

Rasmussen of Columbia University says the possibility of an accidental lab release or even of an engineered virus can't be ruled out, but said either scenario is extremely unlikely -- and Yan's reports provide no credible evidence.

The "extraordinary claim," she said, shouldn't be made without "extraordinary evidence."

"As much as I hate to think of the idea of competent scientists using their work for political propaganda, to me, that's what this seems to be," she said. "And certainly the affiliation with Steve Bannon and Miles Guo and the Society for the Rule of Law does nothing to dispel that suspicion."

CNN's Yahya Abou-Ghazala and Benjamin Naughton contributed to this report.

 
最后编辑:

lindamy

时代广场舞照跳
VIP
注册
2005-11-23
消息
24,188
荣誉分数
5,907
声望点数
373
CNN,Facebook, Twitter等一直被很多人骂,连总统昨天的推中也写到,他这次继续为美国而战的目的包括与这些左媒,big tech战斗。。。。

不提其他事件,不提Foxnews,Carlson做的这个闫博士的报道是什么水平?能和推出后不久,就立即被插旗,封禁的Facebook, Twitter相比吗?具备起码的科学素质吗?这个事件中这么明显的political agenda看不见吗?
 

billwanhua

本站元老
注册
2005-07-07
消息
4,694
荣誉分数
1,343
声望点数
373
Science is science.
Flawed citations, copied passages(剽窃,即使理论成立), mysterious co-authors(- just beneath the title and authors, in a manner that resembles how university affiliations and funding sources are often listed -- are the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation)科学界rule of law 不仅真实姓名主要,所有赞助团体和相关研究人员也重要,比喻烟厂赞助的吸烟无害的研究就没有说服力

. Additionally, a source told CNN the three co-authors of Yan's paper used pseudonyms instead of their real names, a practice frowned upon in scientific and academic work.还有专家说不看文章作者名字做review
 
最后编辑:

lindamy

时代广场舞照跳
VIP
注册
2005-11-23
消息
24,188
荣誉分数
5,907
声望点数
373
1603386343281.png

1603386312365.png


CNN文章中赞扬闫博士受到过很好的教育,没想到却如此轻易地被班农,郭文贵之流的骗了制造这等水平的所谓文章,科学家找到她的两篇 reports 整段,整句,包括图表,照抄匿名blogger的网文。
 

向问天

日月神教光明左使
VIP
注册
2012-09-04
消息
60,464
荣誉分数
10,996
声望点数
1,273
看来,要反共没真本事不行啊!!
 

New Person

本站元老
注册
2003-08-26
消息
5,658
荣誉分数
1,271
声望点数
323
能和郭和班农搞到一起,早就不是什么纯科学了。
 

ccc

难得糊涂
管理成员
VIP
注册
2003-04-13
消息
226,076
荣誉分数
34,883
声望点数
1,393
浏览附件934588
浏览附件934587

CNN文章中赞扬闫博士受到过很好的教育,没想到却如此轻易地被班农,郭文贵之流的骗了制造这等水平的所谓文章,科学家找到她的两篇 reports 整段,整句,包括图表,照抄匿名blogger的网文。

这时代,抄袭是极其容易被抓到的。
 

billwanhua

本站元老
注册
2005-07-07
消息
4,694
荣誉分数
1,343
声望点数
373
这时代,抄袭是极其容易被抓到的。
不知道是不是她写的,可能本来就写好了,让她署名
造假不好证实,抄袭白纸黑字,以后科学界是混不了了
 

lindamy

时代广场舞照跳
VIP
注册
2005-11-23
消息
24,188
荣誉分数
5,907
声望点数
373
人家都匿名,连作者也匿名,这个傻帽偏偏搞真名,还发表
人家自称是吹哨人,是大义凛然的女英雄,救苦救难的观世音,I speak the truth....可惜应当懂得很快会被揭穿.

新编真像是:中国释放病毒的目标是总统。

Bannon and Guo went as far as to suggest that China deliberately infected President Trump with the coronavirus.

Bannon credited Guo for saying from the beginning that the virus not only purposefully emerged from the labs, but that "a target is Donald J. Trump."
 

livingeverywhere

你删贴,就说明你特别害怕我说的,相信JB和贺锦丽真赢8100万选票的人,基本上有认知障碍,离他们远点
注册
2008-08-02
消息
10,541
荣誉分数
1,548
声望点数
373
有人像他们一样,在1月19日就叫喊出来,说这个病毒会泛滥吗?

有人像他们一样,在2月份就叫喊出来,说用羟氯喹可以预防感染上这个病毒吗?

有人知道,无论在什么科学界,在美国政府/媒体/自媒体,都有无数的人,被中共各种影响和控制吗?
 

gcy1208

渥太华自干五
注册
2012-06-29
消息
9,031
荣誉分数
1,792
声望点数
223
有人像他们一样,在1月19日就叫喊出来,说这个病毒会泛滥吗?

有人像他们一样,在2月份就叫喊出来,说用羟氯喹可以预防感染上这个病毒吗?

有人知道,无论在什么科学界,在美国政府/媒体/自媒体,都有无数的人,被中共各种影响和控制吗?
我只想知道,中共那么牛逼,你为什么还没被中共搞死?
 
顶部